Categories
NPO in the media

His Side with Glenn Sacks Radio Commentary: New Yankee Rookie Phenom’s Heroic Father

October 12, 2007

My recent His Side with Glenn Sacks radio commentary for KLAA AM 830 in Los Angeles discusses New York Yankee rookie phenom Joba Chamberlain, who was raised by a single father, Harlan Chamberlain, who was partially crippled with polio as a child and grew up in foster homes. Joba explains: “If I can be half the man and half the father he was, I’ll be very, very happy…[my father] was given what he was given and never batted an eye, never looked back.”

To listen to the commentary, click here. To learn more, see my blog post New Yankee Rookie Phenom Joba Chamberlain Was Raised By Disabled Single Father. His Side with Glenn Sacks radio commentaries are broadcast daily on KLAA AM 830, a 50,000 watt talk station in Los Angeles and Orange County. KLAA AM 830 is owned by Arte Moreno, owner of the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. KLAA hosts include Glenn Beck and Michael Savage.

From 2003-2005, His Side with Glenn Sacks ran in a syndicated talk show format in Los Angeles, New York City, Boston, Seattle, and other cities. To listen to show archives, click here. [audio:http://www.glennsacks.com/hsrc/mp3/hsrc-joba.mp3]

Categories
Blog

Support Shared Parenting Advocate Stuart Meltzer for Nassau County Family Court Judge

Shared parenting advocate Stuart Meltzer, Esq. (pictured) is running for Nassau County Family Court Judge in the November 6 election. Meltzer says:

“The best interests of children are being forgotten in Family Court. Parents are being kept in court unnecessarily and decisions are oftentimes unfair to our children. I am the only truly independent candidate. If you want a judge who owes his allegiance to our families and children, not a particular party, you should vote for me.

“As a result of my over 18 years experience in the Family, Matrimonial and Criminal Courts in the New York area, I have witnessed a steady decline in Equal Protection and Due Process rights afforded to litigants. Most disturbing is the fact that those people who have the smallest voice and least amount of power in our society, our children, are losing most. Thus, I view as most important, based in law and forensic study, our children’s right to liberal access to both a father and mother.”

Meltzer is looking for volunteers in the greater New York City area, as well as donors. Contact his campaign at smeltzer@equalparentingparty.com or by phone at 718-532-4300 or 917 698 8784. Donations can be sent to The Friends Of Stuart Meltzer Campaign, 32 Court St., Suite 1408, Brooklyn, NY 11201.

To learn more about Meltzer’s campaign, click here.

Categories
Blog

Your Letters Wanted by Michigan Newspaper Which Endorsed Shared Parenting Bill

Background: Dads of Michigan, the American Coalition for Fathers and Children’s Michigan affiliate, the Family Rights Coalition, and other Michigan shared parenting advocates are fighting to pass HB 4564, a shared parenting bill. They have the votes to pass the bill but are fighting to get it out of committee, where it is bottled up.

In May, the Michigan National Organization for Women put out an Action Alert opposing HB 4564. I discussed NOW’s opposition to the bill and laid out the case for shared parenting in my column HB 5267 Will Help Michigan”s Children of Divorce (Lansing State Journal, 5/28/06), which I co-authored with ACFC Executive Director Mike McCormick. (HB 5267 was the 2006 bill which is identical to HB 4564).

The Editorial Board of the Oakland Press, one of Michigan’s larger newspapers, just came out with a well-reasoned editorial endorsing HB 4564. Jay A. Fedewa, PE, Executive Director of the Family Rights Coalition, is asking that the bill’s supporters email Allan Adler, the editorial page editor of the Oakland Press, to commend the paper and express support for the bill. His email address is allan.adler@oakpress.com. Please remember to be polite and positive.

The Oakland Press editorial is below.

Equal parenting bill worth passing
Oakland Press, 10/6/07

House Bill 4564 seems to make a very reasonable request: It calls for equal parenting time for fit parents.

The bill was proposed by state Rep. Glenn Steil, R-Cascade and introduced with the support of Reps. Fran Amos, R-Waterford Township; Marty Knollenberg, R-Troy; John Stakoe, R-Highland Township; James Marleau, R-Lake Orion; and 18 other representatives. It is currently in the Families and Children”s Services Committee.

It”s a shame a bill like this is needed but historically, dads have been on the short end in court cases involving custody and visitation when the parents divorce.

The “best interest of the child’ should always be the top priority but too often that “best interest’ leaves dads out of the equation.

Judges have expressed concern that the bill may take away some of their “judicial discretion.’ Well, we”re all for judicial discretion, but someone has to stand up for the rights of fathers, those who are “fit’ and more than willing to share parenting duties.

Our courts say they are doing this now, but judges admit that in the past, the tendency has been to side with mothers, giving them more custodial and/or visitation rights.

If the courts are truly doing this now, then why do so many fathers and their supporters feel the need for this legislation?

We think anything that helps “good fathers’ stay “good dads’ is worth passing. If the law has to be tweaked so that some judges don”t feel so put upon, then make the necessary changes.

But it”s time dads had some rights, too.

Categories
Blog

What Doesn’t a Judge Know that Even a 10-year Old Girl Knows?

What don”t family court judges know?  An awful lot. For instance, a child”s heart.

I am always struck that judges, along with attorneys, are so often asked what is best for children. They have not the slightest training in child development. They have never counseled a distraught parent, or hugged an agonized child.

As a physician accustomed to rigorous scientific scrutiny of what works and what doesn”t, it is inconceivable to me that judges have been put in charge of our lives based on their seat-of-the-pants guesses about what is best for kids.

 And here is the ultimate disqualifier:  they have no means of learning what happened. Without follow-up, they continue as blind as the day they put on the robe. In medicine, we study what happened, and we correct our mistakes of the past. That”s why we don”t still apply blood-sucking leeches to cure typhoid fever. But the judges are still trapped in the 18th century, when there was little alternative but to give sole custody to one parent (in those days, it was the father).

 A member of ours wrote movingly about what happened after the decision of a Massachusetts family court judge to allow his daughter to move to Delaware. This is what the courts never see.

“Heather is almost 10 and has lived in Delaware since October of 2005.  And what is ironic is that I am sure the courts would consider this move a success.  She is doing well in school, has adjusted and made friends, and, overall, is doing very well.  The big problem?  She never wanted to go and hates having her parents so far apart.  We miss each other each and every day.  She tells me, “Dad, when I am in Delaware I miss you and when I am in Massachusetts I miss Mommy.”   

“I just got back from my seventh or eighth trip down there.  I don’t think that it’s fair for her to have to fly back and forth every month so I break it up by going down there every few months.’   

“The courts would see our situation as a success story.  The problem is, Heather and I both hate the way things are.  And we are the only ones who ever have to make sacrifices.  Her mother gets off easy.  Justice served?  Hardly.’

This man feelingly describes his child”s heartache – something the courts will never know.  So they”ll make the same mistake the next time  —  until we do something about it.

Categories
Blog

When Divorced Dads Try to Install Financial Responsibility in Their Children, They’re Labeled ‘Cheap’ or ‘Deadbeats’

The myth of the “deadbeat dad” is pervasive in our society–in some circles, “divorced dad” or “noncustodial dad” are practically synonymous with “deadbeat dad.” One malignant outgrowth of this can be seen when divorced fathers try to install financial responsibility in their children by linking school performance or behavior to money provided for cars or consumer items. The letter below in a column from Annie’s Mailbox last year is a good example.

“Dear Annie: I have a 16-year-old son whom I love very much. I have been divorced from his mother for eight years, remarried for the last six. ‘Brendan’ lives with his mother in the same city, so I see him a lot.

“We had a good relationship until recently. I told Brendan I would give him a car and pay for the insurance if he kept his grades up. He agreed. His first report card, he got a D in one subject. The car stayed at my house. Four weeks later, he got another D on his mid-term.

“The day after he received his grades, Brendan gave my wife and me a very impressive presentation, with charts and everything. He promised to work hard, do extra credit and show us his test scores every week. We caved and let him have the car. Well, he had an excuse every week why he didn’t have his test scores. When his grades came, he had two Ds.

“I told Brendan to bring back the car, and he said I needed to talk to his mom, my ex. Naturally, she took his side and wanted the car to stay at her house, and didn’t care that Brendan and I had an agreement. The car is now back at my place, but Brendan is angry with me, and my ex is probably going to buy him a car.

“I want my son to learn that there are consequences for being irresponsible. Am I wrong? — Worried Dad

“Dear Dad: You are not wrong. A car is a privilege, not a right, no matter what some kids think. You kept your end of the bargain, and if his mother buys him a Porsche, let it be HER problem. Your ex is teaching Brendan that he doesn’t have to work for anything and that it’s OK to renege on agreements. We hope you will keep trying to teach him otherwise, Dad.”

One can almost hear 16 year-old Brendan fuming to his friends that his dad is a cheapskate. I wonder who helped teach him to think that way about his dad?

Categories
Blog

Naomi Margaret Mitchison, Scottish Novelist and Poet, on Her Father

“Of course there were areas of safety; nothing could get at me if I curled up on my father’s lap, holding onto his ear…All about him was safe.”–Naomi Margaret Mitchison, Scottish Novelist and Poet

I think all of us hope our daughters will have the same type of memories of us…

Categories
Blog

Fathers & Families News Digest

Below are some recent articles and items of interest from Fathers & Families’ latest News Digest.

Fathers not short-changed by B.C. Adoption Act, minister says (The Canadian Press, 10-2-07)

Parents to have money taken away from child support payments (Informationliberation.com, 10-2-07)

Dancers lead fight for fathers’ rights (The Morning Sun, 10-3-07)

Televangelist’s Husband Denies Abuse (Associated Press, 10-3-7)

Waterford Police Pursuing Mother in Abduction Case (CBS 6 Albany, 10-3-07)

Family judges campaign to take the bitterness and costs out of divorce (The Times, 10-4-07)

TV chef must sell seafront restaurant in £3.6m divorce (Daily Mail, 10-6-07)

Home at last; Dad brings abducted tot home (The Record, 10-7-07)

A loan that helps couples go solo (Times Online, 10-8-07)

Rise of collaborative divorce is not for everyone (The Washington Times, 10-8-07)

Categories
Blog

Update on the Melinda Smith Foster Care Case

Background: The Melinda Smith/Thomas Smith Los Angeles foster care outrage is one of the most egregious child welfare injustices I’ve ever seen. In my co-authored column, Choosing Foster Parents over Fathers (San Diego Union-Tribune, 7/11/07), I explained:

“In the heartbreaking Melinda Smith case, a father and daughter were needlessly separated by the foster care system for over a decade. Last week, Los Angeles County settled a lawsuit over the case for an undisclosed sum…

“Smith was born to an unwed couple in 1988. Her father, Thomas Marion Smith, a former Marine and a decorated Vietnam War veteran, saw Melinda often and paid child support. When the girl was four, her mother abruptly moved without leaving a forwarding address. Two years later, Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services found that Melinda”s mother was abusing her. Though the social worker for the case noted in the file that Thomas was the father, he was never contacted, and his then 6-year-old daughter was placed in the foster care system.

“Thomas–whose fitness as a father was never impugned nor legally questioned–continued to receive and pay his child support bills. Authorities refused to disclose his daughter”s whereabouts, and didn”t even inform him that his daughter had been taken by the County. Smith employed private investigators and attorneys to try to find Melinda and secure visitation rights, but he eventually ran out of money.

“Rather than allowing Smith to raise his own daughter, the system shuttled Melinda through seven different foster care placements. An understandably angry child, her outbursts led authorities to house her in a residential treatment center alongside older children convicted of criminal activity–when she was only seven years old.

“Melinda says that during this period she was told that her father was a ‘deadbeat dad’ who had abandoned her. When Melinda was 16, she told an investigating social worker that the ‘most important thing’ for her was to find her dad. Moved by her story, the social worker began searching for Melinda”s father–and found him in one day. In 2005, Thomas and Melinda were finally reunited.”

The terms of the settlement in this case are revealed in a recent Los Angeles Daily News article, and apparently Smith is going to receive $225,000 from Los Angeles County. I don’t know much about how these settlements are done, but I’m surprised–Smith should be paid millions for what was done to his little daughter. I know it’s comparing apples and oranges, but it seems particularly low in light of the millions that Los Angeles County had at one point agreed to pay former firefighter Tennie Pierce over a questionable racial harassment complaint.

As part of their agreement with Smith, the County generously agreed to “forgive” Smith’s fake child support debt, not one dime of which should he ever have been asked to pay. Moreover, much of the “debt” piled up after Smith and his daughter were already reunited, as the County still kept sending him child support bills.

The Daily News article by Troy Anderson, who has done a good job in his pieces on this case, is below.

Child-support case may be settled
Father would get $225,000 from county

By Troy Anderson
10/01/2007

A decorated Vietnam War veteran who spent more than a decade searching for his daughter would be paid $225,000 by the county, which mistakenly allowed him to pay child support for the girl although she was in foster care, under a settlement recommended Monday.

The Los Angeles County Claims Board recommended the payment to settle a lawsuit filed by Thomas Marion Smith, who was never told that his young daughter had been taken away from his ex-wife and placed in foster care. The Board of Supervisors will vote on the settlement Oct. 16.

“This is a landmark case having a profound impact on the system,” said Smith’s attorney, Linda Wallace. “At the point of entry, county departments are now notified to make sure children are not lost in the system.”

Lisa Garrett, chief deputy director of the Child Support Services Department, said her agency is working to improve communication with the Department of Children and Family Services to avoid a recurrence of the Smith case.

Smith’s suit claims that county employees were negligent for failing to notify him that his daughter was in foster care. Had he known of the girl’s whereabouts, he would have obtained custody of his daughter and eliminated the need for county intervention.

Read the full article here.

Categories
Blog

How the Domestic Violence Industry Portrays Men-Part II (Video)

Background: The taxpayer-funded domestic violence industry vilifies men and promotes unfair and misleading stereotypes about domestic violence. One example is this amazing series of domestic violence public service ads from HomeFront, a Canadian domestic violence agency.

To learn more and to watch the ad “Restaurant,” the other ad in the series, click here.

The ad “Boardroom” is another example of the way the domestic violence industry views and portrays men. To watch the ad, click here, or see below.

The tagline to the ads is: “You wouldn’t get away with it here–you shouldn’t get away with it at home.” The ads were produced in 2003 by HomeFront, a Canadian domestic violence agency.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VBCgZ1-ZZ-0]

Categories
Blog

Divorced Dad Pays His Support for 13 Years, Breaks His Leg, Misses 3 Months of Work-and Goes to Jail?!

Television reporter Tina Stein (pictured) of WIFR in Rockford, Illinois did an excellent job on the child support piece below. The piece details the case of Ed Conley, an electrician who broke his leg, was out of work for three months, and who nearly went to jail for it. Conley’s friends and relative came up with several thousand dollars to keep him out.

The case is typical of the way the child support system manufactures “deadbeat dads.” Let’s break it down:

1) Conley has a track record of 13 years of “mostly on-time payments.” Then he breaks his leg and can’t work.

2) He repeatedly tries to contact the child support agency to tell them and to get a downward modification, but can’t get through to anybody. Reporter Stein tries this also, and confirms Conley’s experience.

3) Ex-wife hires attorney to pursue Conley for the support she knows he shouldn’t be asked to pay. Her attorney blames Conley, saying, “He could file motions to where they could have child support reduced because they don’t have any income to pay for child support.” Conley had tried to resolve the issue the best he could–his only other alternative would have been to hire an attorney, which he obviously could not afford to do.

4) State doesn’t care, pursues him anyway, threatens him with jail, and only relents when his friends and relatives pay his child support for him.

This kind of outrage isn’t unusual–I hear stories like this all day long. It’s to Stein’s credit that she pursued this story. I spoke with Tina this morning and commended her–I suggest that readers send her a quick note to thank her–click here. Her story is below.

Child Support Concerns
Oct 1, 2007
Reporter: Tina Stein

A basketball injury didn’t earn Ed Conley any sympathy from the state’s Division of Child Support Enforcement, despite his 13-years of mostly on-time payments.

“There were breaks in my leg I have got 2 plates 19 screws in there. I didn’t just sprain my ankle and want to stay off work,” Conley says.

The electrician was off the job for three months and his ex-wife didn’t get any of the 38-hundred dollars owed for those three months either.

“She hired an attorney and that attorney contacted me and basically said I had to pay in full what was owed right then, and sent papers wanting me to be sent to jail.”